<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: C. S. Lewis&#8217; Trilemma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dedwarmo.com/2008/11/06/c-s-lewis-trilemma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dedwarmo.com/2008/11/06/c-s-lewis-trilemma/</link>
	<description>Pronounced dead-warm-oh</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 02:59:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobmo</title>
		<link>http://dedwarmo.com/2008/11/06/c-s-lewis-trilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-8462</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dedwarmo.com/2008/11/06/c-s-lewis-trilemma/#comment-8462</guid>
		<description>Got it, thanks.  Craig says the argument is unsound because the &quot;trilemma&quot; should really be a &quot;multi-lemma.&quot;  However, if you modify the major premise to assume that Jesus was a historical figure, then the argument is valid and sound in the absence of additional alternatives.  I can&#039;t think of any and Craig doesn&#039;t propose any, though he hints that there may be some.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got it, thanks.  Craig says the argument is unsound because the &#8220;trilemma&#8221; should really be a &#8220;multi-lemma.&#8221;  However, if you modify the major premise to assume that Jesus was a historical figure, then the argument is valid and sound in the absence of additional alternatives.  I can&#8217;t think of any and Craig doesn&#8217;t propose any, though he hints that there may be some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dedwarmo</title>
		<link>http://dedwarmo.com/2008/11/06/c-s-lewis-trilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-8445</link>
		<dc:creator>Dedwarmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dedwarmo.com/2008/11/06/c-s-lewis-trilemma/#comment-8445</guid>
		<description>Try this link: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reasonablefaith.org/site/News2?page=NewArticle&amp;id=6257&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;

I can&#039;t view the article in my browser. Or do a Google search for &quot;liar&quot; on reasonablefaith.org. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try this link: <a href="http://www.reasonablefaith.org/site/News2?page=NewArticle&#038;id=6257" rel="nofollow">here</a></p>
<p>I can&#8217;t view the article in my browser. Or do a Google search for &#8220;liar&#8221; on reasonablefaith.org.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobmo</title>
		<link>http://dedwarmo.com/2008/11/06/c-s-lewis-trilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-8426</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dedwarmo.com/2008/11/06/c-s-lewis-trilemma/#comment-8426</guid>
		<description>Which premise does Craig say is false?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which premise does Craig say is false?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

